The three asterisks "***" show what's new since September 21. Only EBFs for the three fully-supported versions of SQL Anywhere are shown here: 10.0.1, 11.0.1 and 12.0.1.
Current builds for the active platforms...
Linux x86/x64 12.0.1.3457 EBF *** 12 Oct 2011 ***
11.0.1.2645 EBF 29 Jul 2011
10.0.1.4239 EBF 17 Jun 2011
Mac OS 12.0.1.3352 EBF 26 May 2011
11.0.1.2449 EBF 29 Jun 2010
10.0.1.4042 EBF 01 Oct 2010
Windows x86/x64 12.0.1.3457 EBF *** 12 Oct 2011 ***
11.0.1.2680 EBF *** 04 Oct 2011 ***
10.0.1.4239 EBF 17 Jun 2011
[Download EBFs here] [Register for the Fuji Beta here]...and for the other platforms:
HP-UX Itanium 11.0.1.2664 EBF 24 Aug 2011
10.0.1.3777 EBF 14 Oct 2008
HP-UX PA-RISC 10.0.1.3778 EBF 16 Oct 2008
IBM AIX 12.0.1 GA Upgrade from 12.0.0 15 Mar 2011
11.0.1.2637 EBF 26 Jul 2011
Linux Itanium 10.0.1.3777 EBF 14 Oct 2008
NetWare 10.0.1.4036 EBF 10 Mar 2010
Solaris SPARC 12.0.1 GA Upgrade from 12.0.0 15 Mar 2011
11.0.1.2632 EBF 07 Jul 2011
10.0.1.4239 EBF 17 Jun 2011
Solaris x64 11.0.1.2645 EBF 05 Aug 2011
10.0.1.3870 EBF 01 Apr 2009
Windows CE 10.0.1.4036 EBF 09 Mar 2010
Windows Itanium 10.0.1 GA Upgrade from 10.0.0 26 Apr 2007
[Download EBFs here]
5 comments:
I do not use those but http://www.sybase.com/detail?id=1091125/ lists more active platform for 12.0.1, including Solaris and AIX...
Your current list would imply those are not supported anymore with 12.0.1 - or is it meant to be read as "commonly used platforms"?
Regards
Volker
The division between "active platform" and "other platforms" is entirely subjective, and it is my opinion only. Having said that, it's hard to justify calling Solaris and AIX "active platforms" when there has not been a single EBF issued since 12.0.1 when GA.
The other reason for the division is to make it easier for the majority of readers to find their platforms in the list.
To answer your question... yes, division does imply that support for Solaris and AIX is more theoretical than real. Again, that's my opinion only.
more... if Fuji is supported on one of the "other platforms" then for sure it will be elevated to "active"... but don't hold your breath for that :)
OK, I do appreciate your opinion - and I agree with your distinction between "theoretically and really supported" platforms.
My original comment is just based on the fact that your blog somewhat serves as "THE SQL Anywhere blog":
Though I guess all your readers appreciate your clear and personal voice (which disagrees often enough with the company's point of view, methinks...), we partly do take this blog as a channel for "pre-official announcements", just as the official channels are sometimes lots slower...
Please just keep on blogging that way:)
Volker Keeps On Reading:)
FYI this blog is NOT a channel for pre-official announcements (a.k.a. "leaks")... sometimes I hear about stuff ahead of time but it is ALWAYS governed by a non-disclosure agreement. This used to be a source of frustration but... the secret to True Happiness is to Lower One's Expectations :)
If you see something on this blog that appears to be a "leak", it's just something that was well-hidden in public... SQL Anywhere is a stealth product, after all :)
Post a Comment